Vitamix 5200 or 5300: Which Is Better?
The Vitamix 5200 and 5300 are presumably two of the most well-known Vitamix blenders, and it’s for a valid justification. These Classic blenders are known for their top-notch execution and solidness.
More critically, they are more reasonable than the Next Generation models. Presently, a considerable lot of people regularly expect that the 5300 and 5200 are something very similar all things considered, the numbers are near one another, correct?
They additionally look practically indistinguishable, correct? Wrong. In the text underneath, we will think about these two models and check out their key distinctions, and ideally, before the finish of the text, you ought to have a thought of what model to pick.
Substance show
Diagram Comparison Between Vitamix 5200 and 5300
Vitamix 5200Vitamix 5300
PlatformC-SeriesC-Series
Horsepower2.0-Peak HP2.0-Peak HP
Pitcher64 Oz64 Oz
Weight10.25-lbs10.25-lbs
Dimension20.5 x 8.75 x 7.25
inch17.25 x 8.75 x 7.25 inch
String Length6 Feet6 Feet
Electric Ratings120 V, 50/60 Hz, 11.5 Amps120 V, 50/60 Hz, 11.5 Amps
Blades4 inches distance across, Laser Cut hammermill and Cutting3 inches measurement, Laser Cut hammermill and Cutting
Beat SettingNoYes
Customizable Speeds1010
Vitamix 5200 versus 5300 Detailed Comparison
To make the correlation simpler, we will take a gander at the critical parts of the blenders, and from that point, we will do a speedy, straight examination.
Pitcher/Jar Size
Vitamix 5200 Blender Professional-Grade,...
- Variable Speed Control: Easily change speed to accomplish an assortment of…
- Enormous Batches: The size and state of oneself cleaning a 64-ounce compartment…
- Hot Soup: The edges in the Vitamix holder arrive at speeds sufficiently quick to…
A strong contrast between the two models is the pitcher size. The 5200 has a taller sky scrapper pitcher, while the 5300 has a safety pitcher with a more extensive base.
Low-profile compartments are ordinarily found on the Next-Generation G-Series, making the 5300 the top blender from an alternate series to utilize it.
Regardless, the pitcher aspects offer a shallow distinction, basically as the holding limit. This is because the two models can deal with 64 ounces of content, as you’re left with a choice of what direction either works for your cooking inclinations.
The 5300, for example, has an element of 17.25 inches, and it’s, subsequently, simpler to squeeze into most cupboards. The 5200, then again, has a component of 20.5 inches, more than three creeps than that of the 5300. Indeed, it may demonstrate testing to store the blender in this way.
Champ
The Vitamix 5300 succeeds, yet not due to limit, but counter space; a position of safety choice can undoubtedly fit inside most cupboards and racks.
Engine/Power
Vitamix 5300 Blender, Black
- Superior Performance Motor - The strong 2.2 HP engine drives edges through…
- Variable Speed Control - Easily change speed to accomplish an assortment of…
- Beat Feature - With the Pulse include, layer course slashes over smooth…
These models highlight strong engines, fit for conveying completely broken-up smoothies and soups. Their significant differentiation lies in amount and time. The 5200 accompanies a 2.0 hp motor, while its rival marginally produces an extra 0.2 hp, adding up to hp.
Does this have an effect?
As I would like to think, the extra 0.2 doesn’t indeed have such a colossal effect. Nonetheless, it would be ideal when you want to make your smoothie much quicker during a surging opportunity toward the beginning of the day.
It may likewise help when mixing parts with more complex textures like ice. In any case, as I’ve referenced above, both of the engines are strong enough for a scope of food things, for example, soups, veggies, smoothies, margarine, nut milk, and that’s just the beginning.
Victor
The 5,300 has a higher wattage. Thus, the victor here, yet not by an embarrassing margin.
The Blades
The sharp edges on both models are planned from solidified airplane-grade tempered steel, which means they can undoubtedly cut through nearly anything at the right speed.
They’re dull to the touch, yet don’t let that fool you; the dull nature guarantees a steady mix that depends on the durability of the cutting edge, just as the animal strength of the engine, rather than the dangerously sharp edges.
Furthermore, given they’re planned from steel, they’re solid, and you won’ need to stress over fix or support costs.
The main contrast between the edges on the two models is the size or, somewhat, the length of the cutting edges. The 5300 sharp edges are 4 inches wide, while those of the 5200 is 3 inches wide. Thus, the cutting edges on the 5300 cover more ground for each given time, and in this manner, are more productive.
To make the examination more straightforward, we will take a gander at the critical parts of the blenders, and from that point, we will do a speedy no holds barred correlation.
Champ
5300 is the champ here on account of the more prominent inclusion.
Level of Noise
Clamor is likely the worst thing about all blenders. Notwithstanding the new advancements on blenders to make them peaceful, the clamor is the main road that hasn’t seen quite a bit of an update.
Both of these machines are uproarious, and they’ll shriek in your ears. Nonetheless, at low settings, either 1 or 2, the commotion level is tolerable and nothing to gripe about. Be that as it may, assuming you wrench the settings higher, you may even have to wear ear insurance.
Controls
The two models are from the C-Series stage, and expectedly, the control settings are indistinguishable in numerous ways. Nonetheless, the 5300 elements have a heartbeat switch, making it more straightforward for you to accomplish thick consistency on your smoothies.
The absence of the beat work on the 5200 isn’t an exceptional major issue since you can also flip the switch on and off to recreate the setting.
Yet, that is assuming you don’t utilize the capacity regularly. Continuing, the two modes fuse a variable speed dial that offers command over the mixed surface.
Away from the variable speed, both models have the most incredible speed of 10. The lower speeds make an excellent choice for creating the thick textures, while the higher velocities will condense your mix.
However, as I had referenced before, 5300 is more powerful, which thus means a higher speed, which may help add to the nature of the mix.
Champ
The highlighted beat setting on the 5300 makes the consistency of your mix chunkier, in this manner, offering better food quality.
Cleaning
The two models have a Clean capacity, which naturally cleans the blender later used. In any case, I wouldn’t encourage anybody to depend on this capacity entirely; you need to give the blender a fast scour with a wipe.
It’s evident while running on oneself cleaning mode, and it’s simple for the vast let overs to remain, bringing about the holder getting shady from mineral fixing inside the compartment after some time.
End and Verdict
These models are incredible, and it was a test to think of a victor. In any case, the Vitamix 5300 superior execution blender comes out solid.
While there’s nothing strange on the 5300, the extra pieces of progress, outstandingly on power, portability, and drive, make it a preferred choice over the 5200.